KLI Colloquia are informal, public talks that are followed by extensive dissussions. Speakers are KLI fellows or visiting researchers who are interested in presenting their work to an interdisciplinary audience and discussing it in a wider research context. We offer three types of talks:
1. Current Research Talks. KLI fellows or visiting researchers present and discuss their most recent research with the KLI fellows and the Vienna scientific community.
2. Future Research Talks. Visiting researchers present and discuss future projects and ideas togehter with the KLI fellows and the Vienna scientific community.
3. Professional Developmental Talks. Experts about research grants and applications at the Austrian and European levels present career opportunities and strategies to late-PhD and post-doctoral researchers.
- The presentation language is English.
- If you are interested in presenting your current or future work at the KLI, please contact the Scientific Director or the Executive Manager.
Event Details
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/5881861923?omn=85945744831
Meeting ID: 588 186 1923
Topic description / abstract:
This talk will present the case against regarding genetic determinism as historically inevitable because cognitively and socially inescapable. The first, shorter part of the talk will critically evaluate four versions of the claim for inescapability: (1) we’re born with a bias towards deterministic thinking about inheritance; (2) we live in a culture riddled with genohype and can’t help but absorb it; (3) we struggle with the idea that effects can be different depending on context; (4) biologists understood how much context can modify inherited characters too recently for it to have penetrated into individual or collective consciousness. The second, longer part will set out an alternative account of genetic determinism as what has come to be known as a “frozen accident,” that is, as the upshot of historical contingency, of events that might have turned out otherwise – in the case of genetic determinism, events at the foundation of genetics that, on the most recent reconstruction, decided whether William Bateson’s deterministic Mendelism or W. F. R. Weldon’s anti-Mendelian interactionism would frame twentieth-century knowledge of biological inheritance. A major element of this account will be the role of Mendelian pedagogy in perpetuating Bateson’s determinism far and wide, and relatedly, on the light thrown on that role – including its accidental status – by an experiment in teaching introductory genetics organized along Weldonian lines.
Biographical note:
Gregory Radick is a historian and philosopher of science specializing in the history of the modern biological and human sciences. Educated in history at Rutgers (BA 1992) and history and philosophy of science at Cambridge (MPhil 1996, PhD 2000), he has been at Leeds since 2000, serving as Director of the Centre for History and Philosophy of Science (2006–08) and Director of the Leeds Humanities Research Institute (2014–17).
His books include Disputed Inheritance: The Battle over Mendel and the Future of Biology (Chicago, 2023); The Simian Tongue: The Long Debate about Animal Language (Chicago, 2007), which received the 2010 Suzanne J. Levinson Prize of the History of Science Society for best book in the history of the life sciences and natural history; and, as co-editor, The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (Cambridge, 2003; 2nd edition, 2009).
He has held fellowships from the British Academy and the Leverhulme Trust, and served as President of the British Society for the History of Science (2014‒16) and the International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology (2019‒21). He writes and lectures frequently for general audiences, contributing regularly to the Times Literary Supplement, and has appeared on BBC Radio 4’s In Our Time and in the PBS/National Geographic television series Genius with Stephen Hawking. In 2022 he was appointed to the Board of Trustees of the Science Museum Group.
